New York, Eos, 2004, $16.99, 353pp
New
York, HarperCollins, 2004, $16.99, 280pp
reviewed
in New York Review of Science Fiction 197, January 2005


|
We learn from books; which is probably one of the principal
reasons we read in the first place, though we may not always acknowledge that
fact. What we learn will vary as we grow older, of course, so a favourite book
is likely to take on a very different coloration when we revisit it in later
life. It is the nature of this learning, I think, that is the major difference
in books written for children and those aimed at an adult audience. We may say
that books for children use simpler language, though the two books under review
use language as rich as many adult novels; we may say they eschew darker issues
of sex and violence, but so do many adult novels, and these two at least
acknowledge varying relationships between the sexes; we may say they are
essentially simpler in structure or concept or some such, but these are both
complex works. No, I think the primary difference is that the intended audience
for these books have more to learn and are happier to take all they can
discover from the books they read. We grown-ups like to pretend we are too
sophisticated for all that, so our lessons have to be disguised; but the
readers of these novels will happily devour broad introductions to questions of
what is right and wrong, what we should and should not do in various circumstances,
how to behave.
There are
times, of course, when as an adult we would find either of these books too
didactic, too blatant in its teachings. But in the main the lessons are placed
within a sugar pill of action and adventure, and there is story enough here to
keep most of us reading happily. Of the two, Kenneth Oppel’s Airborn is
the more old-fashioned, a straightforward rite of passage tale laced with
derring-do that would not have been out of place among the children’s novels of
my own youth. All that is different is that the heroine is allowed to be bold,
intelligent and effective in a way that would have been confined to the male
lead in the tales I remember. Other than that it is a yarn of breakneck pace
and ever-new perils indistinguishable from those which have been holding
readers of all ages agog for a century or more. The ingredients are all there:
pirates, shipwreck, exotic creatures; it could have been written by Robert
Louis Stevenson. That the stately galleon whose cabin boy must save the day
against each new threat happens to be an airship rather than a three-master is
the only thing that really separates it from a host of successors to Treasure
Island.
We begin with
Matt Cruse dangling on a line from the airship Aurora hundreds of feet above
the Pacific as he attempts to rescue an old man lying injured in the basket of
a hot-air balloon miles from nowhere. The old man dies, leaving a peculiar tale
of unknown flying creatures. A year later, and one of the wealthy passengers
aboard the Aurora is Kate, the spirited young granddaughter of the dead man,
determined to prove his claims about the strange creatures in the face of
scepticism from the scientific establishment. Cabin boy and rich girl form an
unlikely alliance as the Aurora
is first raided by ruthless pirates, then shipwrecked on an uncharted island
which just happens to be the nesting ground of the flying mammals and also the
secret base of the pirates. It is Matt who finds the supply of natural
‘hydrium’ which allows them to re-inflate the airship; and it is Matt and Kate
who, alone, can save the day when the pirates take over the Aurora once more.
It’s a
swashbuckler with a stylish 1930s feel to it (both in the setting and in the
tone of the narrative) and rather obvious messages about loyalty, bravery,
learning to respect one’s rivals and other old-fashioned virtues. Sometimes the
messages feel too blatant, and one does occasionally wonder whether its
intended audience really will get on with the style well enough to absorb the
lessons? It is the sort of novel for young readers that is likely to appeal
most to an older audience, readers for whom it recaptures youth, readers who
feel they are allowed to enjoy a simple adventure story because it’s ‘really’
for kids.
Terry Pratchett,
on the other hand, has worked out that one of the secrets of writing for
children is to pretend you are writing for adults. Or maybe that is just a side
effect of the way he has arrived at this latest Discworld escapade. He has been
spattering books for children in among his adult work throughout his career,
but it is only the last few which have been set on the Discworld even though it
has always been popular with young readers. It is no coincidence, I suspect,
that these novels, starting with The Amazing Maurice and his Educated
Rodents, have been the most successful of his books for children. The
latest, a direct sequel to The Wee Free Men, is virtually
indistinguishable from any of his other Discworld novels; fewer footnotes,
maybe, but otherwise much the same cast of characters, the by-now very familiar
terms of reference, and the same sense of humour. And the Wee Free Men
themselves, an amalgam of every legend ever told about belligerent Scots rugby
fans, are the sort of funny hard nuts with a soft centre that have always
populated this riot of half-baked mythology (think of Death, for example, the
City Guard, or, more pertinently here, the witches). As the character of Death
indicates, Pratchett has always somehow managed to tackle big issues; and though
the skeletal figure doesn’t appear, in disguised form this is a children’s
novel about death.
Young Tiffany
Aching (and the presence of a child protagonist is really the only thing that
marks this novel out as a book for children) begins her apprenticeship as a
witch, only to discover that for the most part it doesn’t involve magic at all,
but rather a kind of social service wrapped in smoke and mirrors. There aren’t
that many novelists who would make the care of old people the central concern
in a comic novel for children. But of course Tiffany, as we discovered in her
last appearance, has a natural if unschooled talent for real magic, and the
spells she unthinkingly casts bring her to the attention of an immense bodiless
creature known as the Hiver, a remnant from the creation of the universe that
cannot be killed and cannot be defeated. What the Hiver really craves, of
course, is a sort of death. The witch to whom Tiffany is apprenticed has a
poster for an old circus which advertises ‘See the Egress’, the circus master
used it as a temptation to keep people moving through the exhibits. It is
Tiffany’s job to show the Hiver the egress, which she does in a great set-piece
confrontation at the Witch Trials (it is a typical Pratchett pun to make this
not a court hearing but a sort of sheep dog trial for witches). In this she is
aided by Granny Weatherwax, who has now become such a familiar figure in the
Discworld that Pratchett can give her little more than a walk-on part and still
have her dominate the novel.
Though A Hat Full
of Sky is more subtle (and funnier) than Airborn, it’s lessons – on
death, self-control, and the need to help others – are every bit as
straightforward, not to say blatant. I suspect that the sugar coating is more
effective in Pratchett’s novel, which will help the pill go down more easily
with its intended audience. But I suspect that many of us who have forgotten
that one of the reasons we read is to learn the moral lessons of the world
would also profit from reading either of these books. |