Wesleyan University Press, 2005,
$29.95
reviewed
in Interzone 199, August 2005


|
Science fiction is not one simple, unified
form. It is actually made up of a myriad of strands of themes and ideas and
approaches that interweave with each other in a potentially infinite number of
combinations. We recognise the more substantial themes that go into the mix –
utopias, aliens, space travel and the like – but some can be all too easily
forgotten even though they have generated a considerable body of work. One such
is the subject of this curious book.
In ancient times the dead journeyed
underground to their afterlife in Hades, and this was an idea the Christian
church adopted in its notion of Hell. The most famous literary representation
of Hell is Dante’s Inferno which takes its narrator through successive
rings of Hell, each deeper than the last. This pit of damnation has had such a
strong grip on the European imagination that it is impossible to avoid finding
echoes of it in H.G. Wells’s Morlocks, in the fascist realm of Joseph O’Neill’s
Land Under England, in the post-nuclear torments of Harlan Ellison’s ‘I
Have No Mouth And I Must Scream’, and on and on and on in the representations
of the dark and buried worlds of more science fiction than we might casually
imagine. And yet neither Dante nor the afterlife feature in this critical
survey of the theme.
For Fitting, subterranean realms enter
science fiction through a seventeenth century scientific notion propounded most
notably by Edmund Halley. Seeking to explain some observed perturbations in the
Earth’s magnetic field, Halley proposed that there was another world nested
within our own. It wasn’t much of a theory and it was pretty soon discredited,
except for an American nutcase called John Cleves Symmes who, in the early
years of the nineteenth century, petitioned the American government and just
about every scientific body in the world to fund an expedition that would prove
there was a great hole at the poles, a hole that would prove the entrance to not
one but seven inner worlds. From this, Fitting draws together a series of works
from the early 18th century to the early 20th century
which are based on the idea of this inner world. Each chapter of this book
consists of a critical introduction followed by a number of extracts from the
work in question. Some of these extracts are a page or two long, most are
little more than a paragraph. These extracts illuminate some key idea, usually
the journey to the inner world, the peoples found there, and sometimes the
journey back. On more than one occasion Fitting quotes a sentence or two in his
critical introduction, a footnote a longer passage to provide context, and then
when we turn to the extracts we find the same passage yet again; a measure not
of carelessness, I suspect, but of a sort of over-careful pedantry which should
have been sorted out by the attention to detail one would normally expect of a
university press.
Ranging from the anonymous Relation d’un
voyage du Pôle Arctique au Pôle Antarctique of 1721 to At the Earth’s
Core by Edgar Rice Burroughs (1914), there are stories of realms on the
underside of our Earth’s crust (like a sort of subterranean Orbitsville)
or on interior globes; there are voyagers who travel through the gateway at the
poles or through volcanoes; there are utopias and comic dystopias and simple
adventure stories (and Symzonia, attributed to John Seaborn (1820),
seems to have been a fictional attempt to justify the mad theories of John
Cleves Symmes). There are novels that are still in print (the Burroughs, Jules
Verne’s Voyage au centre de la terre (1864), Edgar Allen Poe’s ‘The
Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym’ (1838)) and to be honest what is said here
doesn’t add much to our understanding or appreciation of them. There are others
which have played an important part in the history of the genre but are less
well known today (The Journey of Niels Klim by Ludvig Holberg (1741),
Robert Paltock’s The Life and Adventures of Peter Wilkins (1750), The
Coming Race by Edward Bulwer-Lytton (1871)), and here Fitting makes a much
more valuable contribution to our understanding. And there are works which have
been deservedly forgotten – Casanova thought that if he was to be remembered,
it would be for The Icosameron (1788), the extracts here demonstrate why
he was mistaken. But there are curiosities here, too: stories which Fitting
admits don’t belong here and which are included simply because they were
classified as subterranean in Charles-Georges-Thomas Garnier’s 36-volume Voyages
imaginaries of 1787-9, one must wonder why he did not omit them in favour
of more relevant works. Poe’s story ends when the traveller reaches the
entrance to the underworld, and so in context is interesting mostly for the
works that have spun off from it, by Steve Utley and Howard Waldrop, and by
Rudy Rucker, though these fall outside Fitting’s timescale and are not
discussed. And there is no mention at all for the most famous of all
underground adventures, Alice in Wonderland, which would have at least
provided an interesting contrast to the rest of this collection.
For anyone interested in the early history
of the genre, this is an invaluable collection. You will find insights here
into works that are probably not even mentioned in most conventional histories
of science fiction. But it is a frustrating collection nonetheless, leaving one
convinced that it could have been a great deal more.
|