Robinson, 1998, 668pp, £8.99
reviewed
in Foundation 76, Summer
1999


|
Judith
Merril was one of science fiction’s proselytisers. She believed that science
fiction could, and should, partake of the qualities of the mainstream, and that
the mainstream would benefit from exposure to science fiction. It was one of
those periods when science fiction was emerging from its ghetto and the writers
in, for example, The Magazine of Fantasy
and Science Fiction, were showing a new awareness of literary style. The
annual anthology series that she edited from the late Fifties into the
mid-Sixties was therefore a deliberate bringing together of work from a wide
variety of sources, from genre magazines to The
Saturday Evening Post and The New
Yorker. It was an agenda that few who have followed in her wake have
maintained, though Brian Aldiss and Harry Harrison could be similarly eclectic,
and Donald Wollheim had an awareness of non-English language science fiction
rare in such annual anthologies. The best of the best of the year anthology
series, however, was that edited by Terry Carr, who rarely showed much interest
in work from beyond the increasingly fuzzy borders of science fiction, but who
conscientiously worked to present and promote what he believed was the best
fiction in the field. Stories, therefore, that did not meet his high standards
or suit his particular tastes (and Carr clearly had a taste for the more
literary end of the genre) were rigorously excluded from the anthology.
A number of other anthologists have
followed on Carr’s path, among them Lester Del Rey who edited a short-lived
year’s best series in the mid-Seventies. Following his death, the series was
briefly continued by a young writer and editor, Gardner Dozois, who immediately
doubled the size of what had previously been slim volumes. Dozois clearly
developed a taste for the enterprise because, not too long after that series
folded, he returned with another, The
Year’s Best Science Fiction, which has quickly come to dominate the field
as an overwhelming compendium of stories that lie safely within the genre’s
confines. This series has now reached its fifteenth annual collection (volume
eleven in the UK’s
horribly renamed edition, since Robinson were slow to pick up on the series in
the first place).
For several years both the American and
the British covers have proclaimed, almost as if it were a subtitle for the
book, ‘More than 250,000 words of fantastic fiction’. Therein lies my major
problem with this anthology: never mind the quality, feel the width. Dozois
clearly does not have Merril’s proselytising instincts. Off-hand I cannot think
of a single story in any of these collections that has been gathered from a
non-genre source; they are in fact most usually first published in the magazine
Asimov’s Science Fiction which Dozois
also edits. Nor is there much if any attempt to present these stories for a
non-genre audience. Similarly, although he is increasingly picking up stories
from Britain and, more recently, from Australia, this anthology is exclusively
anglophone; there is absolutely no awareness of non-English language science
fiction. It is, therefore, a representation of the middle ground of science
fiction, unadventurous in its approach to the genre and safely familiar in its
contents and structure. This is not necessarily a bad thing if, as the titles
of both the American and British editions predicate, this truly is a
representation of what is best within the genre, an establishment and
maintenance of standards, an encouragement by example. Unfortunately that is
precisely what such a vast overview cannot do. There are no readily
identifiable standards followed in the compilation of the book. It is not even
clearly the record of one man’s taste since the work ranges from fine
literature to crude prose, from delicate examinations of character to
simple-minded adventure.
One of the first things that any regular
reader of the series will notice is how familiar each successive volume
appears. Of the twenty-nine authors represented here, at least twenty-one have
appeared in previous volumes, sometimes with alarming regularity (‘[Robert
Reed’s] stories have appeared in our Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth,
Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Annual Collections’). One author, Elisabeth
Malartre, is included here with her debut sale, but that story is a
collaboration with Gregory Benford who is a fairly regular contributor. That
ratio, twenty-one out of twenty-nine, is actually surprisingly low compared to
recent volumes, though it might be explained by a greater than usual number of
British and Australian authors (Paul J. McAuley, Greg Egan, Stephen Baxter,
Peter F. Hamilton, Alastair Reynolds, Gwyneth Jones, Brian Stableford, Ian R.
MacLeod, Simon Ings, Ian McDonald, Sean Williams and Simon Brown — though of
these McAuley, Egan, Baxter, Jones, Stableford, MacLeod and McDonald have all
been here before). The familiarity actually begins, though, before one even
gets to the stories, since each volume opens with a long ramble from the editor
(fifty-eight pages in the UK edition) which consists, as always, of a seemingly
interminable list of the nuts and bolts of science fiction publishing during
the year — so many magazines appeared, so many anthologies, so many
collections, films, books, television programmes, etc., etc., etc., each one
named. There is little worth in any of this (except, perhaps, to an obsessive
bibliographer, who would probably have all the information better presented
elsewhere), since the straightforward recitation of titles is accompanied by
little that might pass as opinion, and what opinion there is seems rather
suspect. He begins, as I have seen him begin on other occasions, by stating
that dire prognostications for the state of science fiction are unjustified,
then proceeds to justify such prognostications with a litany of magazines that
have failed, lists that have been reduced, financial straits that are becoming
ever more dire. If he does not suspect that such dismal facts and figures can
be read as a warning for the state of the genre, how much are we able to trust
his judgement on anything?
Well, if he truly believes that the
twenty-eight stories which follow this ‘Summation’ (Greg Egan is represented
twice, two stories are collaborations) are indeed the best science fiction of
the year, I am not sure I trust his judgement on fiction. Which is not to say
that there are not good stories here; there are, including a couple which I
suspect are about as good as science fiction gets, but there is an awful lot
here that could not by any stretch of the imagination be considered among the
best of anything, and one or two which I personally think should never have
seen the light of day.
What these volumes do increasingly look
like is an assembly of stories driven by a desire not to set or meet standards
(the word ‘best’ in the title is misleading) but to cover all angles. There is
always some wide-screen baroque, there is always some near-future exploration,
there is always something quirky, there is always something character-led,
there is always something adventure-led … Whether anything that falls within
these and other categories could be described as ‘best’ is secondary to how
well they represent the range of what is being written in science fiction
today. How else explain the inclusion of something like ‘The Masque of
Agamemnon’ by Sean Williams and Simon Brown? Unmanned exploration vessels
controlled by barely intelligent nanomachines finally return from their
mission, with the nanomachines having somehow convinced themselves that they
are the Achaean war fleet and the peaceful planet in their path is in fact
Troy. The premise is ludicrous; anything of interest in the dull cardboard that
passes for character is due more to Homer than it is to Williams or Brown,
while the resolution is fudged in one too brief and totally unconvincing paragraph.
The only good thing I can say about this story is that it is short, at least in
comparison to Peter F. Hamilton’s ‘Escape Route’, which reads as if it could
have been written by his namesake, Edmond Hamilton, except that Edmond Hamilton
would probably have been more inventive and less prolix. This tale of space
adventurers exploring a mysterious alien artefact and using it to stage a
daring escape from the bad guys achieves nothing fresh with its hoary old
material and monotonous, uninvolving prose; it is the sort of science fiction
that makes you think that not only did the New Wave never happen, but Heinlein
never happened either. And while Williams and Brown seem to have an inkling
that their story is actually very silly, Hamilton treats his with deadly
seriousness. Mind you, so does Robert Reed whose novelette, ‘Marrow’, operates
on the principle that the bigger your big dumb object the less you have to
bother with tiresome irrelevancies such as intelligence, style, character,
sense, even story. Let’s see; you have a space ship the size of Jupiter
(constructed, of course, by mysterious aliens who have long since disappeared),
you have a crew that is, to all intents and purposes, immortal (the same cast
of characters act out a story that covers a little under 5,000 years), you
have, in the very heart of this spaceship and never before discovered, an
entire, Earth-sized planet which is still going through the intense volcanic
stage of its birth. Given all this magnitude, you also have a nefarious plot to
take over the space ship, a plot of such dimensions that it requires five
thousand years for all its intricate strands to come together, and yet a plot
which, once revealed, can be defeated by one person in less than five minutes.
I thought one of the primary demands of science fiction was supposed to be
suspension of disbelief.
There is enough evidence from these
stories alone that Dozois has no real feeling for the old fashioned sf
adventure, a suspicion reinforced by the pretty dreadful state of the planetary
adventures included here. When not out swashing buckles in deepest space,
science fiction adopted a more serious tone as it wandered among the planets of
our solar system, constricting its stories within what we know of the nature of
these worlds. Judging from the number of times this type of story crops up in
this collection it would still seem to play a significant part in contemporary
science fiction, yet to judge from these same stories there is, in fact, little
new to be said. ‘Crossing Chao Meng Fu’ by G. David Nordley is better written
than the typical Analog story (though
that is not necessarily saying much) and Nordley shows a dim awareness of the
need for character, but do we really need a story about an ill-matched group of
people trekking across a plain on the dark side of Mercury, falling into a
crevasse, then showing all-round competence, strength of character and
unexpected heroism to get themselves out? It may not be as irredeemably
old-fashioned as Hamilton’s effort, but it is hardly cutting-edge. Nor is ‘A
Cold, Dry Cradle’ by Gregory Benford and Elisabeth Malartre, indeed the
unbelievable amount of clunking info-dump which fills up so much of this story
is something I thought even the technologically-obsessed strand of science fiction
had outgrown. The fact that it develops out of the signs of Martian life
supposedly found in a meteorite in the Antarctic makes this story seem up to
date, but the authors still manage to make something drearily hackneyed out of
it all. There is something hackneyed, too, in Stephen Baxter’s ‘Moon Six’ which
is, at first glance, a rather uninspired trawl through different ways the moon
might have been conquered, as the protagonist finds himself propelled through a
selection of alternate realities, but which turns into yet another way for
Baxter to destroy the Earth. In among all this there are occasional neat ideas,
and Baxter is quite effective at describing how the protagonist makes a life
for himself in a world which never went to the moon, but at the end of it all
one is left feeling that there is simply no point to the story. Even so, none
of these stories is quite as bad as the identikit sf perpetrated by Paul J.
McAuley and Alastair Reynolds. A spy is despatched to a moon of one of the
outer planets in the system, where a female scientist, for reasons of her own,
is prepared to hand over undefined secrets. Contact is made, some gratuitous
mayhem ensues, the secrets are handed over, the spy begins his escape, only to
realise he has been double-crossed. The spy dies. That plot outline, with
virtually no variation, describes both Paul McAuley’s ‘Second Skin’ and
Alastair Reynolds’s ‘A Spy in Europa’; the McAuley is slightly the better
written, the Reynolds is more lumbering, but the presence of two near-identical
stories in the same anthology must raise the question of how much Dozois thinks
about, or is even aware of, the contents of the anthology he is putting
together.
Space adventure, of course, has commonly
presented science fiction with a gallery of weird and generally threatening
aliens. Ever since Arthur C. Clarke’s Rendezvous
with Rama and Frederik Pohl’s Gateway,
however, writers have learned that aliens who are not actually on stage can be
far more satisfying —both Hamilton and Reed have tried to follow this lesson.
But aliens remain a potent symbol in the literature, usually now in Earth-bound
stories in which their alienness is intended to cast a satirical, ironic or
revealing light upon our selves and our society. This pattern is found in three
of the stories gathered here. It is at its weakest in ‘Frost Painting’ by
Carolyn Ives Gilman, where the aliens remain unseen except for a shimmering
light, and where the focus is upon a relationship between two lesbians, simply
because the story originally appeared in an anthology of homosexual science
fiction though the sexuality of the characters otherwise has no importance in
either the nature of the story or the way it is told. The fact that the
characters’ sexuality is imposed upon the story rather than belonging
organically within it shows how artificial this tale is. Robert Silverberg’s
‘Beauty in the Night’ is much better, since the focus of the story upon the
relationship between an illegitimate boy and his abusive father is integral to
the structure of the story as a whole. We are in a near-future Britain when the
arrival of enigmatic aliens has brought about a devastating economic collapse.
The father is a quisling member of one of the resistance groups, but the aliens
seem impervious to all attack until the boy manages to kill one by way of
exacting revenge upon his father. The story flirts dangerously with cliché
throughout its length, from the violence of the father-son relationship to the
climactic notion of killing the thing you love, though mostly it manages to
rise above this. I don’t imagine Bill Johnson really minds whether he falls
into cliché or not so long as he tells a good tale, and his ‘We Will Drink a
Fish Together’ is a good tale, though whether, despite its Hugo Award, it can be
considered one of the best stories of the year must remain open to debate. This
is yet another visitation by enigmatic aliens — aliens are always enigmatic
these days — this time intent on trade rather than world domination. Our hero
is a bodyguard who has saved one of the aliens from assassination, but just
when he might exploit the personal relationship that develops as a result, he
chooses to return home to a remote corner of the American West for the funeral
of his tribal elder. The alien follows him, and of course discovers more in
common with the hard-drinking, tribally-loyal Indians of this tiny community
than with the super-smooth diplomats of Washington. The alien is pure cliché,
and is really irrelevant to the real strength of this story which is Johnson’s
evocation of community.
Of course, we don’t actually need little
green men to evoke alienness. Most of the rest of the stories in this
collection manage to do so to one degree or another without invoking strange
visitors, unless you count the strangeness of some humans. There were, for
instance, aliens aplenty in the curious lands visited by Lemuel Gulliver and
which Dean Swift used to provide a savage satire on his times. Now, in what is
undoubtedly one of the best stories in this collection, ‘Gulliver at Home’,
John Kessel considers those who stayed at home, who kept family and home
together in the face of his absences, rumoured death and apparent madness. It
is a subtle and effective story about the cost of imagination, and if nothing
else it shows how much can be achieved by the still popular technique of
re-examining characters from fiction and history, though it has to be said that
Kessel achieves far more than either of the other practitioners of this arcane
art represented in this volume. William Sanders imagines William Shakespeare
swept up among the Cherokee Indians of 16th century New England. The
way that Hamlet is recast to suit the
society and the mores of the Indians is cleverly done, and the response of the
audience to this unfamiliar drama is telling, but one still has to ask what
this particular story is trying to do. I, for one, cannot come up with an
answer; it is a pleasing, light-weight entertainment but nothing more than
that. Much the same is true of Howard Waldrop’s ‘Heart of Whitenesse’, though
being by Waldrop it is a far more complex work and reaches for its inspiration
far more widely and with more abandon than any other contemporary writer is
likely even to contemplate. In this instance, there is a triple play on the central
character, Christopher Marlowe. On one level he is the playwright who is a
government spy, here sent on a mission to investigate the Doctor Faustus who
was also the subject of one of his most famous plays. On another level,
familiar from a great many other games with this notion, he is Marlowe the dry,
witty, ever-competent gumshoe as invented by Raymond Chandler (‘Down these mean
cobbled lanes a man must go’ the story begins in perhaps too blatant a
fashion). On yet a third level he is Marlowe setting out for a fateful meeting
upriver, as Joseph Conrad created the pattern, though in this instance the
river is the Thames, frozen solid in one of those mini ice-ages which actually
came about a century later than the supposed setting of this story. This is a
rich collision of literary co-incidences, typical grist to Waldrop’s mill,
though in this instance I don’t think he really explores the ideas fully enough
to do justice to them.
There are plenty of other ways of
presenting the alien within us. One might, for instance, consider some form of
artificial man. Full metal-jacketed robots seem to have fallen out of favour
since Asimov’s day. The preference now is for beings which are, in all outward
respects, indistinguishable from ourselves, because if they are apparently
indistinguishable it allows authors to ask the big question: what is it that in
fact distinguishes us as humans. Increasingly, the answer is: not much,
particularly when authors tip the balance the way both James Patrick Kelly and
Brian Stableford do by making the artificial beings into children. Kelly’s
‘Itsy Bitsy Spider’ raises a potentially interesting notion when a daughter
visits her estranged father to discover he comforts himself in his increasingly
befuddled old age with a robotic equivalent of her younger self, though this
idea is so smothered in sentiment that it never really gets anywhere. The issue
considered in Stableford’s ‘The Pipes of Pan’, in which newly immortal people
comfort themselves with artificial children, only for the children to begin
achieving self-awareness, is of less interest, but because it resolutely
eschews sentiment it makes for a stronger and better story.
Stableford’s story touches upon but fails
to develop another form of the alien within. If mortality is what defines us,
then immortality will change us absolutely. Ever since Dr Frankenstein made his
creature, science fiction has been fascinated with the notion of cheating
death, and it continues to be a potent image throughout the genre. Sometimes it
is dealt with rather trivially, as in Simon Ings’s brusquely effective but
ultimately rather superficial thriller, ‘Open Veins’. Usually, however, it is
taken at a more measured pace, as in the two very different treatments of grief
in this collection, ‘Lethe’ by Walter Jon Williams and ‘Nevermore’ by Ian R.
MacLeod. Actually, Williams’s pace isn’t so much measured as nearly static.
This is a sprawling novelette bowed down under the weight of its own supposed
significance. Nanotechnology, specifically the ability to download and
reassemble at will everything that goes to make a person, physical and mental,
has all but banished death except under very rare circumstances. Most people
have several ‘sibs’, versions of themselves, though life experiences make these
very different people. Even so, if a couple is in love in one bodily form, then
their sibs will generally be in love also. At least, that is the case with
Davout and Katrin; until one Katrin is killed in a freak accident which means
she cannot be reconstituted, and her Davout must face a grief that is otherwise
unknown in this world. The characters are likeable, the future is richly
imagined, but somehow the focus seems too narrow, as if a big story is being
played out on too small a stage. MacLeod’s brilliant story is much better,
presenting a world in which both living and dead inhabit a virtual reality so
extensive, so everyday, that it is simply called ‘reality’ (which means,
significantly, that they have to invent a new word for the quotidian reality
that we would recognise: ‘foreal’). The hero is a painter starving in a garret
in a foreal Paris that is decaying all around him, while his recently dead wife
continues to inhabit a brightly attractive virtual reality: the story tells, in
wonderfully gritty and convincing terms, of his struggle to come to terms with
both grief and the different realities.
Of course, with their nanotechnology and
their virtual reality, Williams and MacLeod are both using ammunition
previously deployed by the cyberpunks, as do several other writers here, though
only David Marusek’s ‘Getting to Know You’, with its artificial intelligence
able to assume and pre-empt the personality of its owner and a virtual reality
hospice ward, comes close to actually being cyberpunk. Others, typified by
Nancy Kress with the wonderfully titled ‘Steamship Soldier on the Information
Front’, display how science fiction has gone beyond cyberpunk, absorbing its
tropes and concerns and using them to pursue other ideas. Kress, for instance,
gives her protagonist a full arsenal of cyberpunk devices, but portrays him
running hard just to stay in one place as the wave-front of new ideas and
developments sweeps past him. What MacLeod and Marusek and Kress are presenting
is what we might term post-humanity, the way that the nature of humanity is
being changed or is open to change by all the developments in cybernetics,
genetic engineering, information technology, medical science that are potential
in our world. The single overwhelming question being asked is how much we can
stay the same when so much of what we are — from our bodies to our minds, from
our physical shape to our memories — is open not only to change but to
manipulation? It is not a new question — Mary Shelley was asking exactly the
same question in Frankenstein, as was
Robert Louis Stevenson in Strange Case of
Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde — but it is a question that seems to have acquired a
new urgency in contemporary science fiction, and that urgency has generated
more daring, more challenging and often better writing than the science fiction
that blindly follows old patterns. This is not inevitably the case: Alan
Brennert raises such questions in ‘Echoes’ in which a child of genetic
manipulation sees ghosts of all the other people she might have been. It is an
emotional tale but not really a great one. Michael Swanwick considers what it
is like to be human as we know it today when some people have achieved a higher
level while others have devolved in ‘The Wisdom of Old Earth’, but all he has
produced is an old fashioned story of class differences which achieves neither
interesting insights nor dramatic involvement.
Post-humanity is an interesting device
for exploring moral and intellectual questions about our identity and our
nature, but we must be careful with the notion. Simply to raise the idea of a
humanity somehow changed by the future is not necessarily a consideration of
post-humanity; if it were, post-human fiction and science fiction in general
would be all but indistinguishable. Kress considers mankind on the threshold of
our next intellectual leap; Marusek, Brennert, Stableford and Kelly consider
man made different by his technological or medical skills; Williams and MacLeod
consider man made different by the abolition of death. These are very different
types of fiction to be lumped together under the one purview. But most science
fiction presents humankind in different circumstances without itself being
different; that is what all the space adventures and planetary adventures are
doing. Such differences might be in the past, as they are in Kessel’s story, or
in the future as in ‘Winter Fire’ by Geoffrey A. Landis — though this story of
a girl in the near future living through the siege of Salzburg contains nothing
other than a few decorative flounces that could not have been present in a
story of the siege of Sarajevo in the near past. It is perfectly possible to
raise and examine the same issues of morality and identity in a story of a
human in different circumstances as it is in a story of a different human, and
that is what the best science fiction has always been able to do. In this
collection, therefore, it is worth noting that the stories which most
powerfully examine our nature do so without needing to step into the realm of
the post-human.
The post-human, of course, is something
that Greg Egan seems to have made peculiarly his own, though the two stories he
has in this volume are both about changing one man rather than humankind.
(Other than ensuring the magic of his name on the cover, it is hard to see why
Dozois should bother to include two stories by Egan. One, ‘Reasons to be
Cheerful’, is typically inventive, humane and symptomatic of Egan at his best,
but the other, ‘Yeyuka’, is laboured, pedestrian, and about as dull as Egan can
be.) Both stories take medicine as their theme. In ‘Yeyuka’ medical and
computer science have combined to provide diagnostic tests which protect the
people of the Western world from virtually all diseases, but this protection
doesn’t extend to the impoverished Third World where a new cancer rages. A
surgeon volunteers to go to Africa to help treat the disease where he
discovers, surprise surprise, that though treatment for the disease exists
there isn’t the commercial will to develop it. Other than the fact that half of
this story is pure info-dump, and the rest is too prone to sentiment to allow a
proper plot to develop, it is a satire in which the target is too diffuse, too
ill-defined to allow the attack to hit
home with any force. ‘Reasons to be Cheerful’ is a much tighter, more
controlled piece of work. Its protagonist suffers from a rare brain cancer, but
the cancer has also caused a chemical imbalance which makes him perpetually
cheerful in all circumstances. The revolutionary treatment which cures the
cancer also destroys the chemicals that make him cheerful, suddenly, and
without any prospect of remittance, he is incapable of feeling any joy. Later,
another revolutionary treatment allows him to feel happiness again, but in an
artificial form that he controls. Thus, through the three stages of a life
described with far more humanity than is often the case with Egan, we are
presented with very pertinent issues about the way our emotions define us.
Good as ‘Reasons to be Cheerful’ is,
however, it achieves neither the humane insight, the lyrical prose nor the
sheer power of the two best stories in this collection, two of the best science
fiction stories I have read in many a year. ‘Balinese Dancer’ by Gwyneth Jones
is an object lesson in how to create a story, how to build the tale up so
everything dovetails, everything depends on everything else. Nothing — barely
even a comma — could be removed from this story without sending the whole
edifice tumbling down, but with everything in place it is stunning. You see
what is happening in the macroscopic world reflected in some way in the
personal world of the characters. Lessons learned in one sphere echo lessons
pertaining to the other; our perceptions of the one sphere shape and colour our
perceptions of the other. The author might focus upon the microscopic world of
the characters, but there is a wide world around them and we know about that
world through what we learn about the characters. A couple and their child are
touring France by car and stay at a grotty campsite where they discover what
might have been a murder. So much for the plot. Far more interesting is all the
peripheral stuff we learn about the parlous state of their relationship, and
the way that society is breaking down around them, and the way their personal troubles
are connected with the woman’s commitment to the job she has recently lost, and
the way the woman’s work may actually have been one of the triggers behind the
social decay. Everything connects. Nothing is resolved, but we don’t need that
because understanding the connections is far more important and far more
satisfying than understanding what happens next.
‘Balinese Dancer’ is as near perfect a
story as you are likely to find in a long time, but Ian McDonald matches it in
‘After Kerry’, which could be the best thing he has ever written. There is a
science fictional device here, it enters the story almost in passing, a device
that can rewrite our memories. But this isn’t what the story is about. The
story is about Ireland a few years from now, a post-Catholic Ireland as
McDonald calls it, an Ireland that has become a home to all manner of cults and
fashions and ideas. But even that is not what it is really about; it is about
living in that Ireland, about what it is when all the terrible old certainties
have been removed and you are faced with a sudden freedom that is quite
terrifying. It is about a family dominated by a horrible, horrible mother; a
mother you cannot quite hate, because McDonald makes you understand that her
life must have been dreadful, yet still a mother who twists and distorts and
undermines the lives of all those around her. Going back to what I said about
Gwyneth Jones, on the macroscopic level the mother is Ireland. She is a mother
who damages her children to such an extent that one of them flees from home,
even re-writes her memory in order never to have anything to do with anyone in
her family ever again. Then the mother dies. And Stephen, the disappointment of
the family, the one who has never lived up to his own expectations let alone
anyone else’s, the one who dreams but cannot make his dreams come true, the one
who finds himself lumbered with all the family dirty work, Stephen is
dispatched to find Kerry, to tell her that mother is dead, to say everything is
all right now and she can come back home. His quest becomes a journey through
new possibilities, shocks to the system, underminings of old certainties. And
in the end he does find Kerry, Kerry with a new name and new memories and a new
life, and it tells him something about his own memories, his own life. It tells
him something about his new Ireland — though McDonald is not so crass as to
spell that out. This is one from the heart, and it goes straight to the heart.
These are fine stories; not just good
science fiction, but good fiction. But are these two enough to redeem the
collection? Do two stories that must stand up as the best of science fiction
justify a collection that calls itself the year’s best? No, they don’t, they
cannot. There are here good examples of science fiction. Picking them out —
those by Jones and McDonald, of course, along with MacLeod, Kessel, Kress,
Johnson, Egan’s ‘Reasons to be Cheerful’, and stretching the point only a
little the stories by Silverberg, Sanders, Brennert, Marusek, Stableford, Williams
and just possibly Waldrop — you are left with a collection of good science
fiction, a collection that might indeed justify being called the best of the
year. More significantly, you’d be left with a collection about the length of
those edited by the far more discriminating Terry Carr. It is Dozois’s lack of
discrimination, his lack of any clear and definable sense of what ‘best science
fiction’ actually means, which undermines this overweight collection year after
year.
|