Picador 20099, 300pp, £14.99
reviewed
in The New York Review of Science Fiction 258, February
2010


|
One
of the intriguing things about the generation of British mainstream writers who
rose to prominence in the late 1970s and 80s has been their willingness to take
inspiration from science, to look at science as an act of creativity. You can
find examples of this in the work of Pat Barker, William Boyd, Ian McEwan,
Graham Swift and others. One of the first to take this route was the Irish
writer, John Banville, who, in novels like Doctor
Copernicus (1976), Kepler (1981)
and Mefisto (1986), used his Catholic
background to set the creativity of science against the restrictions of
tradition and religion.
Like
many Irish and Anglo-Irish writers, another related theme that he explored in
novels like Birchwood (1973), Ghosts (1993) and his Booker Prize
winning The Sea (2005), was the
decline of family, of the great house, of tradition. And, mid-career, he also
developed an interest in issues of deception, duplicity and betrayal, first
explored in The Book of Evidence
(1989) but far more central in The
Untouchable (1997) and Shroud
(2002) and also in the crime novels he has recently published under the name
Benjamin Black, notably Christine Falls
(2006) and The Silver Swan (2007).
It is
worth looking at these ongoing themes in his work, partly because Banville has
gone on record saying that all his books, all any author’s books, are just
volumes in a single over-arching novel, but mostly because they all come together
in his new novel, The Infinities.
Moreover, what holds these disparate elements together in one coherent comedy
of despair, is a plot that borrows elements of fantasy and of alternate
history.
The
origin of the novel lies with Banville’s adaptation, for the Dublin stage, of Amphitryon by the German
Romantic playwright, Heinrich von Kleist. (One of the clues to the alternate
history setting of the novel, clues that become more numerous and more blatant
as the book progresses, comes when an actress character discusses being in a
revival of one of Kleist’s plays and notes that he is recognised as the
greatest of German Romantic writers, as opposed to his contemporary, the
now-forgotten Goethe.) Amphitryon is a comedy about the way the gods interfere
in mortal life, which is exactly what Banville gives us. Our narrator, at least
at the start, is Hermes, musing on how the immortals envy the very attributes
they gave us, of love and death, while his priapic father, Zeus, is in disguise
busily enjoying one of the mortal women in our story.
Despite
the Olympian perspective, however, this is no recreation of some ancient Greek
myth. The setting is a great country house now running to decay in a rural
Ireland that is not quite contemporary, not quite our world. The house is now
the home of eminent mathematician Adam Godley (given the gods hanging around
his home, the name is appropriate), though the former owner is still there as
housekeeper and one of the ‘rude mechanicals’ who provide Shakespearean comic
relief around the fringes of this story.
If
this gives a sense of something theatrical, in an overwrought way, that would
not be too far from the truth. The whole is an overt turning away from realism,
which Banville sometimes handles crudely, as in the novel’s broad comedy, and
sometimes with great subtlety. There is, for instance, one very finely judged
atemporal moment right at the beginning of the novel when Adam’s son watches a
train move slowly past the house and sees a young boy craning his neck to keep
staring at the building. Some chapters later we realise that Adam himself was
that young boy, catching his first glimpse of the house that would one day
become his home.
All
times are one because this is what we anticipate will be Adam’s last day on
earth. Some time before, he suffered a massive stroke and now lies in a coma in
a heavily curtained room at the top of the old house. His alcoholic wife,
Ursula, hovers at his bedside while other members of the family and various
hangers-on are drawn to the spot. There’s his son, also Adam, rather dull and
ineffectual and not quite sure if his marriage to the sexy actress Helen is
coming to an end. There’s Petra, his daughter, fey, brittle, and
psychologically detached from the world. There’s supercilious Roddy Wagstaff,
who pretends to be Petra’s boyfriend though he is really there to win approval
as Adam’s official biographer. And there’s fat, mysterious, Benny Grace, whom
nobody seems to know yet who seems to have had a long and intimate connection
with Adam’s career, and who may be an incarnation of mischievous Pan.
Or
maybe not. Part way through the novel the voice of Hermes drops away, and we
begin to realise that the narrator is actually old Adam. Released from the
inert body, his mind is free to roam like a god, backward over his life and on
into the world that life created. Zeus’s enthusiastic sex life merely reflects
Adam’s lust for his own daughter-in-law. Yet there is still a sense of an
unseen presence, still Adam’s intangible thoughts seem to have a tangible
effect upon the world; one of the most consistent elements in Banville’s work
is the raising of questions that seem to be answered, but never fully, there is
always a hesitation in the reader’s mind. The gods never quite go away.
And
the world that Adam looks out on from his deathbed is a very different world.
Godley’s fame rests on equations that prove the existence of multiple worlds,
so the fact that this novel takes place in a parallel reality is in some way a
representation of Godley’s thinking. What’s more, these same equations seem to
have been instrumental in the introduction of cold fusion, so that the trains
and cars we se are powered by sea water. Of course, the scientific decks have
to be cleared to allow al this, so we learn that Einstein’s theories have been
discredited, and Wallace’s theory of evolution has been refuted.
The
alternate history we occupy, therefore, allows the infinities of Godley’s
greatest work, but it has a more significant political and cultural role to
play within the novel. Early in the novel, in reference to Adam’s wife, Ursula,
we learn that St Ursula was one of those demoted by one of the reforming
English pontiffs. In our world there has been only one English pope, Adrian IV,
1154-59, so something significant has changed. Then Banville casually mentions
that Mary, Queen of Scots, executed the traitorous Elizabeth. I would imagine
that Banville has not read Pavane by
Keith Roberts, which has a hauntingly similar turning point (the assassination
of Queen Elizabeth on the eve of the Spanish Armada), but the effect is the
same: England remains a Catholic realm. For Roberts, the survival of
Catholicism means that the Dymchurch flit recorded by Rudyard Kipling did not
happen, and there are fairies still in Britain. For Banville, it allows the
survival of the gods, or at least of the superstitions and belief structures
that allow the gods to flourish.
Banville
has thought through the consequences of this change. We get odd references to
the changed political shape of Europe: Sweden, for instance, is a warlike
state. But such changes are not what the novel is about, Banville is not
concerned to describe what such a world might be like, but rather to establish
a setting in which Adam Godley and his work might operate. And the triumph of
Catholicism is surely, as much as scientific endeavour, behind the overthrow of
Einstein and of Darwin’s coeval, Wallace. Because this alternate history allows
Banville to return, yet again, to the tensions between the creativity of
science and the restrictions of tradition.
If the rationality of the creativity of science
and the approaching death of a great scientist seem to sit oddly with the
irrationality of godly narrators flitting about the scene, it is because there
is one god and one aspect of creativity that are central to the book but never
mentioned there. The unnamed god is, of course, John Banville, and this is a
novel in which we are constantly made aware of the creativity of the novelist.
He draws attention to the narrative voice, he relishes the artificiality of his
stage, his characters are all involved in some way in world creation, he
spotlights the process of writing by hesitating over choice of word – should he
say the stairs go up, or down? what is the precise colour of someone’s
clothing? Even the unexpected happy ending is deliberately made to appear
artificial: the doctor who enters in the final scene is called Fortune. All his
novels, Banville says, are just one novel, and here is where he makes that
unity overt. Themes from across his career are pulled together, with the fresh
narrative drive learned from his Benjamin Black novels. The result is very far
from being his best work, but it has an odd joie de vivre, an unexpected
lightness of touch, that is surprisingly infectious. |